I read the article, “Obama wants Marines to wear ‘girly’ hats” on New York
Post. According to the New York Post, President Obama’s plan to create a “unisex”
look for the Corps has officials on the verge of swapping out the Marines’
iconic caps with a new hat. The article claims that a change to the Marine
Corps’ uniform hats could leave hard-nosed Leathernecks looking a lot less
macho. It also says that a new version hats have derided as so “girly”. The
article supports its claim by providing a statement of one senior Marine, “We
don’t even have enough funding to buy bullets, and the DoD is pushing to spend
$8 million on covers that look like women’s hats. The Marines deserve better.
It makes them look ridiculous.” The article provides exact numerical value as
evidence. It shows that a male cap is $32 while a female cap is $82. Going with
the traditional cap will save $284,043 because the current female caps are more
expensive. The article emphasizes that there are more men in the Marines than
women. I think the article uses causal argument. It claims that the new version
Marine uniform hats cause some unfavorable effects. The article supports its
claims by providing examples (argument by example). It also gives a great
warrant to connect its claim and grounds.
Tuesday, November 5, 2013
Robyn Lawley, Plus-Size Model w/o a "Leg Gap" -- Ellen DeGeneres Talk Show 11/5/13
I was inspired to write about a story I watched on the Ellen
DeGeneres talk show on November 5th, about a new “plus-size” model
dealing w/controversy for being a size 12.
Robyn Lawley, originally from Australia, began her modeling career
trying desperately to lose weight after numerous negative comments were made by
agents, modeling agencies, etc. encouraging her to lose more weight, however she finally decided it was best to
love herself the way she is and embrace her fuller figure. At 6’2” and a U.S. size 12, she was called a “pig”,
“hefty” and “too fat” on a Facebook photo.
Why? Because she is a size 12 and
did not have a “leg gap”. Apparently
society feels a woman isn’t skinny if when standing with your feet together,
you do not have a gap between your thighs.
This seems absurd to me when statistics state the average size for women
in the U.S. is around a size 12 or 14.
Women are consistently being critiqued either being put down for being
too big or ridiculed for being too thin.
In watching this episode and doing additional internet searches on this
model, the claim seems to be a value based claim, that this obsession about
weight should not be the main focus for women and men alike and also could be
seen as a policy claim about how things need to change when it comes to images
of an ideal woman. It seems this was a
pathos form, trying to get viewers passionate about how wrong this obsession
about weight is and we would be better off to spend our time doing and thinking
about things that are more positive.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)