As the article from Fox News has surfaced that starts out about Marissa Mayer being quoted about the feared winding up in prison for treason if she refused to comply with US spy demands for data. In an onstage interview her at the TechCrunch Disrupt conference in San Francisco about Yahoo doing what they can to protect the privacy of their users and the validity of demands for data collecting. Marissa Mayer's fear about the arrest and detention is unfounded, maybe she is playing it safe, maybe she is not fully educated on violation of NSA directives. Intrusion of individual privacy is in itself an abhorrent practice, it has been rendered doubly potent by the collusion of these new-age Internet businesses. Instead of standing up for user rights, these companies have ratted on its user activities. Amazon, Apple, BlackBerry, Dell, eBay, Facebook, Google, HP, HTC, IBM, Lenovo, Microsoft, Samsung, Sony, Twitter and any other technology firm that you want to mention is equally at the whim of the NSA and other US government organizations.
And she certainly has enough access to skilled corporate lawyers to know that the mass collection of data is UnConstitutional and if she challenged it in court and took it to the SCOTUS she would almost certainly win and also deliver a big win from this government tyranny for the American people. But neither she nor any other of these execs wanted that- they just want to cry crocodile tears now that their complicity has been exposed.
Lastly, the only way we "Constitutionally Protected Rights" are going to be protected is if we who "Formerly Served In The Armed Forces", become this regime's worst nightmare. Which is exactly why they're coming after us. When this speech becomes illegal, I'll become a criminal: "I may become an enemy of the state, but never of the people". Remember this: "Always aim just below the blue helmet. No matter what color it is."
Thursday, September 12, 2013
Yahoo CEO fears defying NSA could mean prison
Here we have an article from Fox News that starts out about Marissa Mayer being quoted about threats of treason. It goes on to interview her about Yahoo doing what they can to protect the privacy of its users and the validity of demands for data collecting. Although it seems to have gotten to the point where there isn't much more they can do and refusal to the demands results in being reprimanded in serious ways. NSA demands and consequents are not allowed to be spoken of by Mayer. Yahoo, along with Facebook, Google, and Microsoft have been doing what they can to inform, warn and protect their users from the NSA tracking every little thing. Very quickly this article moves on the NSA its self and how over the past few years have broken their own rules about privacy laws. They have gone through citizens phone and internet records that have no suspected links to terrorism. Fox has a few arguments to make in this piece starting with it not being right for the NSA to come in and demand compliance or penalty without just cause. Second, it is not right for the NSA to peek into the privacy of everyday lives without court order and substation evidence of needing to do so. Lastly if the NSA is doing this and collecting all this data how long will it be before they can't contain information they are gathering and can no longer protect the average person or business.
"Horror Flick Secretly Filmed at Disneyland. What Could Go Wrong?"
This article, written by
Asawin Suebsaeng, details the controversy around the making of a “guerilla”
style horror film, entitled, “Escape from Tomorrow”, which premiered as one of the biggest hits at
this year’s Sundance Film Festival. Randall Moore, the film’s creator, bravely decided
to film his movie at the infamous Disneyland theme park without Disney
Corporation’s consent. The film features disturbing content that is certainly
not synonymous with the ideas of childish joy and innocence that are typically
associated with the park. The film is said to feature bizarre and twisted plot
elements and characters doing shocking things such as “vomiting and defecating
simultaneously at the theme park.” The film is drawing a lot of attention, not
only due to the interesting dichotomy of dark themes explored within the
confines of what has been dubbed, “the happiest place on Earth”, but also
because Moore may be facing some very serious legal charges for his choice to
create the film without getting the go-ahead from Disney. Because the film
depicts Disneyland in such a negative light, it is very probable that Moore
will face legal consequences for his bold actions. Moore chose to handle the
post-production editing for his film primarily in Korea so Disney would be less
likely to uncover his plan of action. Suebsaeng argues that the controversy
around the film only makes it even more attractive to broader audiences.
“Escape from Tomorrow” can be found online and is most likely worth a look
before the Big Bad Walt Disney Company cracks and makes it disappear forever.
"A Horror Flick Secretly Filmed at Disneyland. What Could Go Wrong?"
This article, written by
Asawin Suebsaeng, details the controversy around the making of a “guerilla”
style horror film, entitled, “Escape from Tomorrow”, which premiered as one of the biggest hits at
this year’s Sundance Film Festival. Randall Moore, the film’s creator, bravely decided
to film his movie at the infamous Disneyland theme park without Disney
Corporation’s consent. The film features disturbing content that is certainly
not synonymous with the ideas of childish joy and innocence that are typically
associated with the park. The film is said to feature bizarre and twisted plot
elements and characters doing shocking things such as “vomiting and defecating
simultaneously at the theme park.” The film is drawing a lot of attention, not
only due to the interesting dichotomy of dark themes explored within the
confines of what has been dubbed, “the happiest place on Earth”, but also
because Moore may be facing some very serious legal charges for his choice to
create the film without getting the go-ahead from Disney. Because the film
depicts Disneyland in such a negative light, it is very probable that Moore
will face legal consequences for his bold actions. Moore chose to handle the
post-production editing for his film primarily in Korea so Disney would be less
likely to uncover his plan of action. Suebsaeng argues that the controversy
around the film only makes it even more attractive to broader audiences.
“Escape from Tomorrow” can be found online and is most likely worth a look
before the Big Bad Walt Disney Company cracks and makes it disappear forever.
Sports Illustrated Exclusive: College Students Smoke Pot
In this article published on the Mother Jones website, reporter Tim Murphy reviews an article originally published by Sports Illustrated. The Mother Jones article features original commentary by Murphy, as well as excerpts from the Sports Illustrated article.
Murphy's argument is structured by first giving the audience some basic information about the story in review. The story was published as an installment of a "five-part investigation into the Oklahoma State University football program." Murphy explains the investigation had been looking into a "culture of academic cheating and allegations of cash payments to the athletes." He further explains that it was found that many of the football players smoke marijuana, even before games, and includes an excerpt from the Sports Illustrated publication. He furthers the discussion though, by pointing out that non-athletic students also smoke marijuana, the only difference being the athletes are subject to random drug testing. Murphy also includes evidence from an ESPN investigation into marijuana use in sports to help make his point that marijuana use by athletes is not new news. He also uses this evidence to make his argument that there has not been an explanation as to why this "problem" is in fact such a problem.
Murphy's argument seems to be that he does not agree with the need to have all these investigations into pot smoking, without first an explanation as to why it is such a big deal. He explains that although marijuana use by athletes is shown as a "malignant problem," an explanation as to why it is so bad has never surfaced. His concluding statement explains that marijuana is an increasingly popular and legal drug, leaving readers with the thought that you cannot die from marijuana, but you can die from football.
Murphy's argument is structured by first giving the audience some basic information about the story in review. The story was published as an installment of a "five-part investigation into the Oklahoma State University football program." Murphy explains the investigation had been looking into a "culture of academic cheating and allegations of cash payments to the athletes." He further explains that it was found that many of the football players smoke marijuana, even before games, and includes an excerpt from the Sports Illustrated publication. He furthers the discussion though, by pointing out that non-athletic students also smoke marijuana, the only difference being the athletes are subject to random drug testing. Murphy also includes evidence from an ESPN investigation into marijuana use in sports to help make his point that marijuana use by athletes is not new news. He also uses this evidence to make his argument that there has not been an explanation as to why this "problem" is in fact such a problem.
Murphy's argument seems to be that he does not agree with the need to have all these investigations into pot smoking, without first an explanation as to why it is such a big deal. He explains that although marijuana use by athletes is shown as a "malignant problem," an explanation as to why it is so bad has never surfaced. His concluding statement explains that marijuana is an increasingly popular and legal drug, leaving readers with the thought that you cannot die from marijuana, but you can die from football.
Sports Illustrated Exclusive: College Students Smoke Pot
This article focuses on the "shocking" trend that college students participate in the use of recreational marijuana before their games. As the article from Sports Illustrated has surfaced, many different opinions have arisen on how to deal with the issue. However, Tim Murphy who has written this article, analyzes the claims made by Sports Illustrated and puts it into a perspective which makes the issue seem less severe. Players from the time when the Oklahoma State football team made itself a force to be reckoned with within the football collegiate community have since them come forth and admitted to the vast marijuana use that occurred before games. Running back Hershel Sims claims that if the drug use had been more monitored, there would have "lost 15-20 people who actually played." Although drug use is forbidden, Murphy brings forth the fact that they use of marijuana within the players systems did not have any effect on their playing ability, therefore it does not seems like a pressing issue to deal with.
"Couple Thoughtfully Puts Up Wedding Website For Friends To Mock" By S
http://www.theonion.com/articles/couple-thoughtfully-puts-up-wedding-website-for-fr,33837/
This article is from "The Onion", a fake news network. In this article we see a screen-shot of a photo that can be seen on a wedding website created by a thoughtful couple for their friends to enjoy. Although, the friends seem to be enjoying it in a manner unintended by the couple; which is a problem with making a website in a public domain. I believe making a website also brings in the eyes of people who will troll the couple as well as ignite conversations with the couples actual friends. A whole can of of uncanny comments would erupt in the first place with making the couples wedding more open than it should be.
Another thing about this article is that it makes sort of an overly exaggerated mockery of couples who do like to involve their close personal friends to one of their biggest decisions ever. I personally feel like they could have made a document or a well polished presentations only their friends can access.
I know this is just a fake news network but what it reflects is true some people really do make fun of some of the things people do to get their friends involved in their marriage.
This article is from "The Onion", a fake news network. In this article we see a screen-shot of a photo that can be seen on a wedding website created by a thoughtful couple for their friends to enjoy. Although, the friends seem to be enjoying it in a manner unintended by the couple; which is a problem with making a website in a public domain. I believe making a website also brings in the eyes of people who will troll the couple as well as ignite conversations with the couples actual friends. A whole can of of uncanny comments would erupt in the first place with making the couples wedding more open than it should be.
Another thing about this article is that it makes sort of an overly exaggerated mockery of couples who do like to involve their close personal friends to one of their biggest decisions ever. I personally feel like they could have made a document or a well polished presentations only their friends can access.
I know this is just a fake news network but what it reflects is true some people really do make fun of some of the things people do to get their friends involved in their marriage.
Sports Illustrated Exclusive: College Students Smoke Pot by Tim Murphy
With recent development in the area of athletes and the use of marijuana, many opinions are emerging as to how it may be dealt with. Many are opponents of the drug, noting its negative effects. This specific article, written by Tim Murphy is not necessarily encouraging the use of pot for athletes, but its an attempt to put things in perspective. Many former athletes have come out and admitted to either the use of marijuana, or the witness of drug use, specifically the Oklahoma State Football team,who actually experienced success during a period of increased drug use . Of course the use of marijuana is illegal in 48 states, Tim notes that the performance has never been affected, and comments by saying “And unlike, say, football, no one who uses it is going to die as a result. You’d never know it from reading the sports pages”. It is a critique of sports reporting, and how the issue is overblown. He compares it to the controversial college athletes who earn money as well. “..Paying players is forbidden by the NCAA...even though many of the players who allegedly received cash were broke and incapable of holding down a paying job because they spend most of their free time providing unpaid labor for a multi-billion dollar cartel”. He argues for the sake of athletes, and illustrates the simplicity of the drug, and its often use with no ill-effect.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)