I read the article, “Obama wants Marines to wear ‘girly’ hats” on New York
Post. According to the New York Post, President Obama’s plan to create a “unisex”
look for the Corps has officials on the verge of swapping out the Marines’
iconic caps with a new hat. The article claims that a change to the Marine
Corps’ uniform hats could leave hard-nosed Leathernecks looking a lot less
macho. It also says that a new version hats have derided as so “girly”. The
article supports its claim by providing a statement of one senior Marine, “We
don’t even have enough funding to buy bullets, and the DoD is pushing to spend
$8 million on covers that look like women’s hats. The Marines deserve better.
It makes them look ridiculous.” The article provides exact numerical value as
evidence. It shows that a male cap is $32 while a female cap is $82. Going with
the traditional cap will save $284,043 because the current female caps are more
expensive. The article emphasizes that there are more men in the Marines than
women. I think the article uses causal argument. It claims that the new version
Marine uniform hats cause some unfavorable effects. The article supports its
claims by providing examples (argument by example). It also gives a great
warrant to connect its claim and grounds.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.