I watched a news commentary talk show on Ifeng TV. The topic
they analyzed yesterday is the possibility that Japan will replace Saudi Arabia
as a member of the Security Council. The guest they invited thinks Japan won’t
take the opportunity.
In the introduction part, the host introduces the background
information first. Saudi Arabia rejects seats on U.N. Security Council and then
Japan tries to get the opportunity. I think this part is necessary to let all
the audience knows what they are talking about.
And then he states the claim that Japan won’t be selected as
a member of U.N Security Council no matter seeing from the subjective view or
objective view. In this part, he notices the audience that he would talk this
topic in two parts and it makes his argument organized and clear.
From the subjective view, the first reason is Japan is so
busy dealing with their domestic affairs so Japanese may save some energy to
take care of their own country. And the second reason is that this position is
not as powerful as Permanent members of the U.N Security Council which Japan
really wants to be so it is not very attractive to Japan.
For the objective conditions, there is an important reason. China
and South Korea are all Security Council members and Japan is too close to
them. Conventionally, all members in Asia cannot be concentrated in East Asia
and U.N. needs some opinions from Arab countries.
Maybe because the duration control of the show, he didn’t
give a conclusion which I think is the only shortage of the whole argument. He
followed the traditional argue structure and divided his body part into two
main part by two different views and it makes his argument clear and more convincible.
Overall, he did a good job in this show.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.