I read an article, “Don’t tell Muslim women what to wear” on CNN website.
The article is about Amira Osman, a 35 years old Sudanes engineer woman, was
arrested in Sudan last August and charged with “Indecent dress” A police
officer demanded that she cover her hair, but she refused and said that “I am
Muslim, and I’m not going to cover my head.” The author Frida Chitis claims
that, the right to decide what one wears is a basic freedom even though the
matter of whether or not to cover one’s hair may seem like a trivial issue. It obviously
seems value claim. She says that, the strict rules by the government or
religious authorities dictating women’s attire are almost always the tip of the
iceberg. Through this statement, she emphasizes that coercion to cover hair
cannot be ignored as trivial issue. This coercion takes away women’s right to
make other important choices about their own lives. Frida uses emotional
reasons by providing some Muslim women’s cases who charged by the Islamic
rules. She points out that, the Islamic rules are strict but conveniently
vague. Frida also acknowledges that enforcement to wear a headscarf can be a
good way to keep the product of deeply traditional societies. However, she
refutes that the societies are changing, and women are part of those societies.
Many accept the restrictions, but not everyone is happy with the status quo. She
provides evidence from the World Economic Forum’s Gender Gap Report, not all
Muslim countries impose terrible restrictions on women, but the worst countries
in which to be a woman are almost all Muslim-majority states in Africa, the
Gulf, and South Asia. The author made value claim, and support her claim by
providing evidence from reliable source.
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2013/11/04/opinion/ghitis-muslim-women-rebels/index.html?hpt=hp_t4
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.