One of the main reasons that many people use as a reason
to keep abortions legal is that they can terminate the pregnancy if they find
out that their child will be born with a birth defect or disease. Some people even think it is okay to do an
after-birth abortion. What about the
people who do not get diseases until they are older? Once we find out that they
have a disease, we should just kill them too, right? Or why should we kill the children right
away? Let’s wait until they’re older and kill them then!
Another reason that I have heard a little bit of is that
abortions are fine because it’s a way of reducing overpopulation. If we want to reduce overpopulation, we could
just start killing people once they hit a certain age. We could just have an international law
where once you get to your birthday of a certain age, someone is designated to
snap your neck and get rid of you.
Sounds like a perfectly plausible option!
Another
option we have is to have everyone have a restriction on the number of children
they are allowed to have. That would
surely reduce overpopulation! If we are
killing babies by having abortions anyway, why not have them be mandatory after
someone has a certain number of children?
If we see nothing wrong with abortions, why would we find anything wrong
with this tactic?
There
are so many options to face the problems that we use as an excuse for abortions
being “okay”. These solutions seem to
make just as much sense to me as simply just keeping abortions legal.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.